logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.19 2016고단2223
상습절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant habitually stolen and intruded upon a structure, following the opening entrance to the “E church” managed by the victim D, who was in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-gu, and then intruded into the distribution of worship.

The defendant discovered that the victim was walled by the victim in the vicinity of the entrance of the towing distribution, and stolen the wall with 120,000 won in cash.

In addition, from around that time to July 1, 2016, the Defendant invadedd the buildings managed by the victims 16 times, such as attached Table 1, and stolen property habitually.

2. On May 25, 2016, the Defendant found a truck parkeding without correcting the Victim H in the “G” located in Ulsan-gu F, Ulsan-gu around 12:00 on May 25, 2016.

The Defendant saw and stolen the gap in which the victimized person gets a meal into another truck, and 50,000 won in cash.

In addition, from around that time to June 15:00 on June 28, 2016, the Defendant habitually stolen property on five occasions, such as attached Table 2.

3. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant attempted to remove and intrude the back door of the restaurant as the date Raber, which was possessed by the victim J, located in Ulsan-gu I, Ulsan-gu, the victim J of the victim J, in order to remove and intrude into the restaurant.

However, it did not go through the wind that the corrective device has not been removed, but was attempted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Habitual larceny of the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment: In cases of intrusion on a structure under Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act, comprehensively taking into account paragraphs (1) and (2) of the criminal facts: Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective of imprisonment): Attempted crimes of intrusion on a structure under Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act: Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the most punishment) shall be imposed on concurrent crimes.

arrow