logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.07.12 2018구합5080
파면처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s status relationship was appointed as a policeman on August 5, 1989, and was promoted as of July 4, 2008. On July 23, 2014, the Plaintiff served as the Ulsan Southern Police Station B Team issued on July 23, 2014.

B. On December 20, 2016, the Plaintiff was detained on suspicion of illegal action after the acceptance of bribery, etc. and was prosecuted on December 29, 2016.

The criminal facts are as follows.

C On January 2015, 2015, the Defendant was accused of a complaint to the police station, instead of being paid KRW 77,50,000,000,000,00,00 from E, a new Dogdong-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, U.S., and the Plaintiff and C got involved in the countermeasures against the instant case from E on January 2015.

The Plaintiff, on its job, told C that “Nin, this case would not be what he would have received. It would be possible to make the instant case upon request to the Ulsan-Namn Police Station, which would be subject to a disposition of suspicion by making an investigation. It would be possible for C to receive a disposition of suspicion. It would be limited to expenses.” At the same time, C received this request from the police officer in charge of the instant accusation case at the police station of the police station, who was in charge of the said accusation case at the location of the police station around that time, and by posting a telephone to the police officer in charge of the said accusation case at the police station at the time of the police station, who was in charge of the police station at the time of his death and death. Sgr., was going to go through the Section of the Ulsannsan-gu Police Station, so if you sent the investigation to the Ulsann-Namn Police Station, it would be subject to an investigation at the Busan-Namn Police Station on January 22, 2015.”

On February 4, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) demanded expenses to prepare a suspect interrogation protocol in order to send a phone call to C for disposal as above; and (b) receive KRW 2 million from C to a new bank account in the name of the Plaintiff on the same day; and (c) around February 12, 2015.

arrow