All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts or misapprehension of the legal principle) is that the act of the victim distributing the former part of the “written notice of receipt of a lawsuit claiming return of benefit to the party,” and the delegation agreement of this case does not constitute a business as the representative of the occupants of the apartment of this case. The above written notice also contains unlawful contents, such as defense and violation of the law, and thus cannot be deemed as falling under the “business” subject to protection of the crime of interference with business under the Criminal Act. Thus, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants in the facts charged of this case are the Dong representative of the Namyang-ju E apartment, and the victim F is the chairman of the above apartment occupant representative meeting.

피고인들은 2015. 9. 16. 22:00 경 위 아파트에서 자신들이 선임한 변호사를 통해 위 아파트에 대한 하자소송을 진행하고 있음에도 피해자가 새로이 변호사를 선임하여 부당 이득 반환청구소송 등을 진행하려고 한다는 이유로 피해 자가 위 아파트에 배포한 ‘ 부 당 이득 반환청구소송 접수 안내문’ 전단지 및 위임 약정서를 임의로 수거하고, 피해자가 고용한 아르바이트 생인 G, H, I에게 “ 이런 것을 돌리면 불법이다, 경찰에 신고하겠다, 휴대폰으로 인증 샷을 찍어야 겠다.” 등의 말을 하면서 겁을 주어 그들이 소지한 위 전단지 및 위임 약정서를 빼앗았다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the representative work of the victim.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

(c)

(1) The term "work" subject to the protection of interference with business under the relevant legal principles refers to a work or business that is engaged in occupation or continuous work, and is caused by another person's illegal act.