1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Nonparty Switzerland exported high-class vehicle parts, etc. to Nonparty A of the Hah Group, and requested the Plaintiff to transport exported cargo several times.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to transport each of the following containers (hereinafter “each of the instant cargo”) in which the vehicle parts were loaded, while promptly exporting the Hadar group:

No. B/L No. 1 of the Bill of Lading No. 1. B/L No. 500, VVU250841 (1 Cargo No. 8596869 on February 16, 2010, 16 February 24, 2010, MAEK WAL MING MU MU AL CR AL AL-UUPPPPPU 2813 TNU 281 TNU 808 (2 Cargo) 86010, 2763, 2010, 14, 367, 14, 2010, 14, 2010, 16, 36, 36, 14, 10, 106, 10, 360, 27, 10, 206, 14,010.

The Plaintiff demanded a seaway bill as a transport document related to each of the instant cargo. D.

The defendant shall receive each of the goods of this case, load each of the vessels listed in the above table, transport them at the port of Busan to Akbaba, and transport them at the sea from April 5, 2010; the 19th day of the same month; and

7. 20. The arrival at each Acarf Port.

E. On the arrival of the port of Akb, a consignee of the cargo stated in the written request for shipment and a marine cargo waybill, who is an agent of the Plaintiff’s local agent, requested the issuance of a cargo delivery order for each of the instant cargo by submitting the documents stated in the bill of lading number (the serial number stated in the above bill of lading number) to the Defendant, and accordingly, the Defendant issued a cargo delivery order for each of the instant cargo to each of the instant consignee. Accordingly, the Defendant issued a cargo delivery order for each of the instant cargo to each of the instant consignee, based on this.