1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance : (a) using “the defendant company” as “the non-party company” in the 6th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) adding the judgment of the court as follows, it is identical to the statement of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding adding the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The plaintiff asserts that "The representative director C of the company abroad actually operates the defendant, and the former and incumbent representative director L, M, K,O, and P are merely a title trustee."

However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge only the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 (including each number), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.