The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On February 16, 2017, at around 02:10 on February 16, 2017, the Defendant changed the “taxison the front door of the F building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government” to have the taxi passengers take a bath and have a long time.

After receiving the report of 112, G GJ H, who was born at the back seat of the taxi, she laid the Defendant on the front seat of the taxi, and she was in the vicinity of the taxi, and she was asked to present an identification card to impose a penalty for minor crimes by slope H. Then, she was asked to “the father of the Republic of Korea, she was aware of the Gun by her father,” and she was asked to keep his/her identification on the right side of the slope H one time to the face of the slope by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who was dispatched after receiving the 112 report, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H to H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the exercise of violence against police officers on the grounds of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for and postponement of sentencing below: fine 2,00,000 won, fine 1,00,000 won per day of detention in the workhouse), the sentence against the defendant shall be mitigated by taking into account the following factors: (a) the degree of damage is minor; (b) the defendant has neglected to find He several times and agreed on it; (c) the defendant has no past record of criminal punishment; and (d) the defendant's age and occupation are against the defendant; and (b) the sentence against the defendant shall be suspended by taking into account the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age and occupation.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.