Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bchip taxi.

On November 17, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi on November 21, 2017, and led to the intersection in front of the D cafeteria in Seopopo City C, Seopo City, to the speed of about 50km from the red distance to the same rogate.

In this case, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the crosswalk, such as checking whether there is a pedestrian or not, and accurately manipulating the steering and operating the steering gear, as it is a road where the crosswalk was installed at night and there was a rain, and in this case, the defendant has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim E (Woo, 60 years old) who was a pedestrian with the right side from the left side of the Defendant’s running of the crosswalk as it is, but did not avoid it, and was faced with the victim by the front side of the said taxi.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure of a galone-day plant, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident-related statement of E;

1. An accident scene photograph and a survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (E);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The instant accident with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is sufficient for pedestrians in the crosswalk, and the Defendant’s negligence is not less light but more severe for the victim’s injury.

However, the defendant recognized the crime and reflects, and the taxi that the defendant driven is subscribed to the mutual aid association of private taxi nationwide.