1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 15 million to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from July 21, 2017 to November 9, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in Gap evidence No. 1 together with the purport of the entire pleadings.

In May 26, 2003, the plaintiff and C have two children of 1999 and 2002 under the sus.

B. The Defendant served in the certified judicial scrivener office, and served together with the above office.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion (1) The Defendant knowingly committed unlawful acts, such as having a sexual intercourse with C, from around 2015 to around 2017, with the knowledge of the Plaintiff’s spouse.

Due to the defendant's improper act, the plaintiff suffered from mental pain after the failure of the marriage between C and C.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 30,000,100 won to the plaintiff as consolation money for such unlawful act.

(2) Defendant C came to know of C through an ombudsman who attempted to hold events using the Internet site. While Defendant C love the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were able to have an agreement with each other, the Plaintiff would have been in congested with C. On February 9, 2017, Defendant C had an agreement with D, the former husband, for marriage with C.

However, C entered into a relationship with the Defendant and returned to the Plaintiff, which led to the Defendant’s economic and mental damage and suffering.

In addition, the Plaintiff had already been in a state of bankruptcy between the Defendant and C before the adoption of the marriage between C, and due to which, the Plaintiff, from April 2016 to January 2017, was proceeding with C in order to make a divorce between C and C.

Therefore, the defendant's establishment of relations with C cannot constitute a tort against the plaintiff.

B. (1) The following facts are comprehensively taken into account the descriptions or images of evidence Nos. 3-5, 7, and 8 by the Defendant and C’s improper act (A) and the purport of the entire pleadings.