beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 25, 2016, at around 15:10 on December 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was working for a franchisor in 6 water dong B, a franchisor, a franchisor, who had viewed a dispute as a franchisor with the victim C (55 years old) and television franchisor; (b) the Defendant would not be punished by imprisonment with labor for the victim’s franchisor; (c)
p. Maz. Maz.
"...." In drinking, the victim's face was taken twice from the victim's face, and the victim's face was taken once, and the victim was injured by an injury, such as the cutting off of the inside and bottom of the floor, and the cutting down of the aggregate of the ducts, which require surveillance for about six weeks of time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence photographs, medical records, and diagnosis reports);
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Selection of Punishment Act [the scope of recommending punishment] is the basic area (from April to January) of the first type of bodily injury (the general scope of punishment] [the sentence] imprisonment in August]. The crime of this case in August is one of the crimes committed by the defendant by unilaterally assaulting and injuring a prisoner, and the nature of the crime is not good, the injured person who did not agree with the victim wishes to punish the defendant, and there is a number of criminal records of the same kind of violence against the defendant. It is inevitable to sentence sentence in light of the following: (a) the crime of this case is committed by the defendant unilaterally.
However, the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by a comprehensive consideration.