The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the defendant is the female volunteer group leader in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul apartment complex B, and the victim C is the elderly group leader in the same apartment complex.

1. The Defendant, around April 2017, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, even though the victim did not have received subsidies of KRW 17 million from the Dongdaemun-gu office in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, which is a member of the Senior Citizens Association, living in the above domicile, even though he did not have received subsidies of KRW 17 million from the Dongdaemun-gu office, thereby damaging the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On June 2017, the Defendant: (a) did not know that the injured party received subsidies of KRW 17,00,000 from the Dongdaemun-gu Office in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) instead, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information that he/she received subsidies of KRW 17,00,000 from the head of the elderly group (the victim’s name) who resides in the above address; and (c) reported the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information.

2. Determination

(a) Punishment Acts: Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

C. Expression of intent that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant after the prosecution of this case

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;