The judgment of the court below is reversed.

① The Defendant’s each crime listed in [Attachment 1-8] No. 491 of the Highest 2017 List No. 1 of the 2017.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. According to the progress records of the instant case, the following facts can be acknowledged:

1) On May 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced, from the lower court, to the Defendant, for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for “the crime listed in [Attachment Table 1 to 8] of 2017 Highest 491 Highest 491, 2-A, and 808 Highest 2017 Highest 80 (hereinafter “part 1”),” and for “the crime listed in Attached Table 1 of 2017 Highest 491, 491 and 9 through 15, and 2-B (hereinafter “part 2”)” among the facts charged against the Defendant.

2) The Defendant submitted a petition of appeal to the lower court on June 5, 2017, stating that “The Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months against the order 491(2) [Attachment 2017] (hereinafter “the first appeal”) but shall file an appeal to the appellate court on June 29, 2017” (hereinafter “the first appeal”). The Defendant submitted a written reason for appeal to the lower court on June 29, 2017, and the foregoing Defendant stated that “The Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year at the Jeju District Court on May 31, 2017 and appealed against it.”

4) On July 13, 2017, the Defendant submitted a second petition of appeal to this court on this court, and there were parts written by the Defendant “2017 order 808 [Provided, That there are parts written on the second part of the foregoing “2017 order 808 order 2017 order 808 order 2017 order 808 order 2017 order 736 [2017 order 2017 order 8], and this is not deemed to have been corrected by the Defendant in light of the different types of the pen or gate, and the part separately assigned by the appellate court in the process of the receipt of the document is considered to have been written.

I seem to be a clerical error in the crime of false writing, such as electronic records, in relation to the registration of a letter, etc.

on July 17, 2017, the defense counsel of the defendant, who was sentenced to six months of imprisonment, filed an appeal against the appeal, stating the following (hereinafter referred to as "the second appeal") 5), submitted a statement of reason for appeal to this court.