logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.09.05 2019고단1592
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

provided that this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a game room in the name of “F” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu and the third floor; Defendant B is a person who provides money in exchange for money in the above game room; Defendant C is a person who instructs customers requesting money in the above game room to exchange with Defendant D and Defendant D works as an employee in exchange.

1. No person who defendant A shall provide game products the contents of which are different from those of the game products rated by the Game Products Management Committee for distribution or use;

From September 11, 2018 to September 23:20, 2018, the Defendant installed 50 G game products (rating number H) rated by the Game Management Committee in the above game site from September 11, 2018, and provided them for the use of customers who found out the modified game products so that they can read the data of the IC card that contains the result of the game in a separate smartphone and delete it.

As a result, the defendant provided customers with game products different from the contents of the rating.

2. No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible outcomes obtained through the use of game products by the Defendants;

Nevertheless, Defendant A instructed Defendant B and Defendant C to exchange KRW 4,500, excluding 10% of the money exchange commission per 5,000 points, at the above date, at the above place, and at the above place, to enable customers to obtain points using G game and exchange points stored in the IC card. Defendant D exchanged the above to customers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

arrow