Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of an 'Esing practice room' located in Ansan-gu, Seoyang-gu.

1. Around 01:40 on July 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sold and supplied alcoholic beverages to one other than the F, which found in the room No. 3; and (b) breached the obligations of a karaoke machine business operator, by selling and providing five cans, beer, and beer, etc. to one other; and (c) thereby violating the obligations of a karaoke machine business operator.

2. Although the Defendant did not employ or arrange a contact loan at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant breached the obligation of a karaoke machine business operator by receiving KRW 25,00 per hour and allowing a female with a contact loan (one person (one person) to sit together with customers and provide singing and dancing with customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police interrogation protocol of the accused (the evidence record of the case 2015 High Court 963);

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Promotion of Music Industry, Articles 34 (3) 2, 22 (1) 3 (the point of sales of alcoholic beverages), 34 (2), and 22 (1) 4 (the point of brokerage of adjacent loans), and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears litigation costs

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is an owner of an “EMing practice room business” located in Ansan-gu D.

At around 23:00 on October 17, 2015, the Defendant received 25,000 won per hour and provided three females (G, H, and I) with music and dancing with customers, and violated the rules of practice of karaoke machine business operators.

2. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against G, H, and I as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, has been written, but this is a witness G, H, I, and I.