logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.04.02 2012고정4218
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:30 on September 21, 2010, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by force, such as the victim D (V, 28 years of age) who was boomed in front of a C cafeteria located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by holding her her her son or her son on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the fact that the defendant denies the crime of this case and did not reflect the defendant, that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, and that the circumstances, means, methods, and

Where a judgment to submit personal information becomes final and conclusive, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Articles 32 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and is obligated to submit personal information to the chief of the competent police station pursuant to Article 33 of

However, an order to disclose or notify the registered information needs to be careful in that it may have a significant impact on the defendant, and in this case, it is judged that there are special circumstances that may not disclose the registered information, such as where the registration of personal information alone appears to have an effect to prevent recidivism of the defendant. Thus, it does not issue an order to disclose or notify the registered information.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow