logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.18 2017나90645
손해배상(자)
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance different from each evidence submitted in the court of first instance submitted in the court of first instance, it is justifiable to recognize and determine the facts of first instance.

Therefore, the reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance are as follows, and the reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance are as follows. Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

o No. 12 of the third trial decision of the first instance court "It is difficult to find it possible to recover in the future."

"......."

o The 5th sentence of the first instance court’s 2th sentence “I have the obligation to perform” is deleted, and the Defendant in the 5th sentence “I have the obligation to perform” is moving to “the Defendants”.

3. Thus, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow