logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2021.01.19 2020고정654
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 9, 2020, from around 18:00 to June 15:31, 2020, the Defendant embezzled the property that he/she had on his/her own thought and embezzled on his/her own, without following necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim B ( South, 60 years of age) even though he/she acquired a credit card copy of the Nonghyup Bank, which was owned by the victim B, from the time when he/she became aware of the fact that he/she had come to possess from the possession of the victim.

2. Fraud;

A. On June 10, 2020, the Defendant presented the credit card acquired, as stated in the above Paragraph 1, at the D Beauty Room located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Annyang-si, and had the victim E (e.g., 51 years of age) settle the price of KRW 40,000.

B. On June 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) purchased personnel stones at G pharmacy located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si; (b) presented the credit card acquired as stated in the above “1” as if he was the true card owner; and (c) had the victim H (the age of 65) settle the price of KRW 30,000.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victims and allowing them to settle the total of 70,000 won of the value of the goods over two occasions, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business used the credit card lost by B at the same time and place as “2-A, B” as “2-A, B”.

4. On June 12, 2020, the Defendant attempted to pay a sum of 30,940 won by presenting the credit card acquired, as stated in the above “1” in the “J Burial” located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, as seen in the above “1,” to K employees of K (e.g., 50 years of age) as if he was the nominal owner of his true card, but did not receive any attempted payment due to the lost theft card.

Summary of Evidence

1. A description of the Defendant’s use of a theft card in his written statement B prepared by the court;

arrow