beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 500,000,000 on the Plaintiff and as a result, from February 12, 2018 to May 9, 2018.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of the claim - The amount of joint and several sureties: 500,000,000 won - The due date for payment: February 11, 2018 - The Defendants shall pay to the Plaintiff 10% (10% (10%) interest per annum from the day following the due date to
- On February 11, 2017, the Plaintiff withdraws the complaint against D and expresses to the court its intention not to punish D.
The Defendants agreed on February 11, 2017 between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff that the Defendants jointly and severally guaranteed the debt owed to the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”) is not a dispute between the parties.
The main contents of the instant agreement are as follows.
B. Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of joint and several liability KRW 500,000,000 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum as stipulated in the instant agreement and 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from February 12, 2018 to May 9, 2018, which was served on the Defendants by the original copy of the instant payment order from February 12, 2018 after the maturity date.
C. As to this, the Defendants asserted that the instant agreement was concluded on the condition that D is released, and that the instant agreement is null and void since D was not released.
D The agreement of this case was reached, subject to release.
Since there is no evidence to prove that the validity of the agreement of this case differs depending on whether the agreement of this case is discharged or discharged, the defendants' assertion is rejected.
(As seen above, the agreement of this case merely states that the plaintiff should withdraw the complaint of this case against D and express his intention that he does not want the punishment of D to the court, and in fact, the plaintiff appears to have expressed his intention to withdraw the complaint against D and not want the punishment of D as stipulated in the agreement of this case). 2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and therefore, it is ordered to accept it.