Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

D The acceptance of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) on June 2007 and the same year

9. A person who acquired F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) and participated in the management of the two companies, and the Defendant became aware of the foregoing D around 1998, and became a friendly relationship with D.

D In accepting H (hereinafter “H”) as an individual person with G, etc., D was indicted on suspicion that he/she had committed property damage equivalent to the face value by arbitrarily endorsed the bill in the name of F on the fake bill in the name of KRW 10 billion in face value of his/her management and then having delivered it to G to G, thereby incurring property damage equivalent to the face value, and it was tried in the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes”) at the Seoul Central District Court 2014 Gohap 898. D asserted that the above judgment was merely a fact that he/she refused to accept the request for F’s endorsement after delivering the blank bill in face value to G and the Defendant, and received a refund of the bill.

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness and took an oath in the instant case, including the above 2014 Gohap 898, and testified to the effect that “The Defendant himself received a note with the face value of the issuance of E in relation to H acceptance from D and demanded D to make an endorsement in the name of F, but D refused and returned the bill to D without being endorsed.”

However, in relation to H acceptance, the Defendant did not receive from D a note, the face value of which is the blank of the issuance of E, or the endorsement under F, and did not return the note to D. Therefore, the Defendant did not have such memory.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false testimony against his memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the defendant;

1. A protocol of examination of the witness of the accused on January 14, 2016;

1. The decision of the court, 2014, 2014, 898, the statement prepared by the prosecutor on November 6, 2008 (I) and the F related to the destruction of bills.