1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s person eligible for veteran’s compensation against the Plaintiff on January 14, 2015.

1. On September 3, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on June 2, 2014 at the Korean Army Search Team B, and was discharged from military service on the due date. On September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted on September 1, 2014 that “A person eligible for veteran’s compensation was suffering from military service due to the injury on the left-hand side in the valley, while carrying out the rapid pedagoging games conducted by the military unit on March 7, 2014, the Plaintiff’s application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “the instant injury”). The Defendant presented to the Plaintiff on January 14, 2015, the medical opinion that was not an obvious causal relation between the Plaintiff’s injury on the left-hand side and the dives of dives of dives and the dives of dives of dives and the dives of dives of divesium.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant difference occurred due to the injury, which was separated from the satise, the left-hand satise of the left-hand satise, in the valleys during the process of performing the duty of the rapid communications of the military unit, which was in March 7, 2014, during the process of performing the duty of the rapid military forces, or was rapidly aggravated at a natural progress speed at least, and thus, the instant difference has a proximate causal relation with the military duty and education and training, and thus, the instant disposition contrary thereto is unlawful.

(b) the facts of recognition;