1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 15, 2012, the Plaintiff, upon obtaining a license from the Defendant for a final waste recycling business pursuant to Article 25(3) of the Wastes Control Act, has been operating a waste disposal business by installing waste timber crushing facilities.

B. On July 19, 2017, the Defendant issued a disposition ordering the Plaintiff to suspend its business for six months from July 19, 2017 to January 14, 2018 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without a partial dispute, entry in Gap evidence 2 and 3]

2. The details of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes are as shown in attached statutes;

3. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. At the request of the representative director C of a company B, which was known to the general public, the Plaintiff provided a repair place to repair a mobile scrap scrap, which is equipment of the above company B, and the act of crushing waste timber using a mobile scrap scrap is merely a test run during the repair process, and the above mobile scrap scrap is not newly installed.

(1) (hereinafter referred to as "claim")

Even if the Plaintiff disposed of wastes using mobile scrapers, it is merely a temporary use, and thus cannot be deemed as falling under the “construction of waste recycling facilities” subject to permission for change.

(hereinafter “B”). 4. Determination as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition

가. ① 주장에 대한 판단 (1) 인정사실 ㈎ 원고의 폐기물 최종재활용업 허가에 따른 장비와 시설은 파쇄시설 75HP 1대, 수집운반차량 1대(D)이고, 재활용용량은 연간 14,400톤, 허용보관량은 1,440톤이며, 원고는 위 허가에 따라 그 사업장에 고정식 파쇄기 1대를 설치운용하고 있었다.

㈏ 피고는 2017. 4. 14. 원고가 허가받은 시설이 아닌 이동식 파쇄기를 이용하여 폐목재를 처리하고 있다는 제보를 받았다.

A public official E belonging to the defendant is the plaintiff around 15:00 on the same day.