1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's successor who has been expanded in the trial.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the witness of the first instance court's 4th and lower than the fourth of the first instance court's 4th and the witness of the 6th to 21th of the 6th instance court's 17th of the 6th instance court's 17th of the 17th instance court's 20th of the 20th instance court's 20th of the 20th instance court's 20th of the 6th to

A person shall be appointed.

A. The succeeding intervenor paid KRW 5,007,760 to the Plaintiff by March 2015 pursuant to the National Pension Act. The succeeding intervenor may subrogate the Plaintiff’s damage claim against the Defendant within the scope of the amount of the above disability pension paid to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 114(1) of the National Pension Act. As such, the succeeding intervenor sought payment of KRW 5,007,760 and delay damages to the Defendant.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Thus, the claim of this case by the plaintiff and the successor is all dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and consistent with this conclusion, and all the claims of the plaintiff and the successor intervenor added in the trial and the successor intervenor are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.