logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.11.06 2014고단2255
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 5, 2004, around 07:03 on August 5, 2004, the summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, was in violation of the vehicle operation restriction by operating the said vehicle at the Incheon Expressway Business Office, which is a cargo truck owned by the Defendant, with a load of more than 10 tons with a limited weight of more than 11.17 tons in the third axis.

2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); or Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); or Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 10655, Dec. 24, 2011; Act No. 10653, Dec. 14, 2011; Act No. 10688, Dec. 31, 2005; Act No. 8677, Mar. 21, 2017.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow