A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant violated the sentry Order: (a) at the Air Force Air Force Control Headquarters C’s waiting room for operations; (b) from around 21:30 of the same day to around 05:30 of the same day, the Defendant stated that he/she would replace his/her working hours with Byung Byung in order to work together with his/her kind of soldiers, even though he/she was placed in the front house of the military police unit for the base boundary from around 17:30 of the same day to around 21:30 of the same day; and (c) changed the working hours to “from around 17:30 of the same day to around 21:30 of the same day to “from around 05:30 of the following day to around 09:30 of the same day”; and (d) changed the working hours from that year to that of the same year.

6. From ten days to ten, in the same manner, the sentry was replaced or replaced without good cause, not in compliance with the established rules by the same method, such as the part of attached Table 1, in a total of five times as in the list of crimes.

2. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant, who escaped from a sentry, was placed in the front house of the Air Force Air Force Air Force Air Force Control Headquarters C on May 18, 2017, and was placed in the front house of the said front house for base boundaries from 17:30 on the same day to 21:30 on the same day, but was placed in the front house of the said front house for the purpose of telephone communications with E staff who was under guard at the time, and from that time, left the front house for the purpose of telephone communications.

6. From October 19:30 until December 19:30, a person left the water station or did not go to the water station by the designated time, without good cause, in total at least three times, as in Annex II.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Each police statement made against F, G, H, E, I, A, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. Each statement of P, Q, I, R, T, U, V, W, X, Y, D, H,O, N, Z, L, and AA;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the table of order of reflect service of military policemen;

1. Article 40 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act of the corresponding military Article 40 (1) of the same Act concerning the crime (the violation of the first order) and subparagraph 3 of Article 28 of the Military Criminal Act (the violation of the first order) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: