The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 05:30 on July 2, 2016, 2016, the Defendant loaned a victim C (the victim C) who was aware of, and was diving at the house, in front of the 105-dong 105-dong apartment complex B, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, with a usual back line; (b) borrowed a taxi fee; (c) however, he did not have money; and (d) did not run an act to stop wrapping, such as refusing to do so; (d) he was frighting to the victim; (e) he was frighted to the victim’s head and shoulder; (e) he was frighting the chest at two times; and (e) the victim was frighted to enter the house and frighting the victim’s face by drinking the defective vehicle; and (e) the Defendant was frighting and frighting the fright by using it.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

Since it can be recognized that the defendant expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.