1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. On June 2008, Ansan-si Group B Co., Ltd., which was awarded a contract from the Defendant for the construction of a new factory on the Defendant’s ground (hereinafter “float Construction”), awarded a subcontract to the Plaintiff during the said new construction work.

【Ground for recognition】 An absence of dispute

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

가. 원고의 주장 선택적으로, ① 원고는 플라이한양건설이 부도난 이후 공사를 진행하지 못하고 있었는데, 피고가 하도급업체인 원고에게 공사대금을 직접 지급하기로 약정하여 공사를 진행하였고, 그 공사대금은 케노피, 담장, 대문 공사비, 하이샷시를 알루미늄샷시로 변경하여 발생한 추가공사비, 2층에서 3층으로 설계 변경함에 따라 발생한 내부창호 추가공사비 등 합계 48,455,500원(부가세 별도)이므로, 피고는 원고에게 이를 지급할 의무가 있거나, ② 플라이한양건설이 부도난 이후 원고는 피고로부터 공사를 직접 도급받아 공사를 완료하였고, 그 공사대금은 합계 48,455,500원(부가세 별도)이므로, 피고는 원고에게 이를 지급할 의무가 있다.

In addition, after the completion of the new construction of the defendant factory, the plaintiff added the construction work at the defendant's request, and the construction cost is KRW 9,956,900 (excluding surtax).

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 58,412,400 (=48,455,500 won) plus the value added tax to KRW 9,956,90), as well as delay damages therefrom.

B. First of all, there is an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant that the construction cost should be paid directly by the respective statements on the construction cost before completion, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the testimony by the witness C of the first instance trial, witness D of the trial, and E, and the testimony by the witness D of the party concerned, and that the construction cost should be paid directly by the Plaintiff and the Defendant, or that the construction cost should be KRW 48,45,500 (excluding additional tax) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.