(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017노461 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017노461

사기등

Text

The judgment below

Of the above, the part of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A except for the crime of 2016 order 143 shall be reversed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s judgment rendered by the lower court on each of the remaining crimes except for the crime of “2016 Highest 143” (two years and six months of imprisonment) as indicated in the lower judgment. (b) In so doing, the lower court’s punishment (excluding the crime of “2016 Highest 143” among the lower judgment, appealed on the remainder of the crime except for the crime of “2016 Highest 143 highest 143). Defendant B1 did not inflict any injury on the victim inside or outside of the vehicle as indicated in the facts charged, nor did the Defendant inflict any injury on the victim, even if the

Even if the defendant who was assaulted by the victim first of all, the defendant's act of defense is a legitimate defense in the course of physical fighting that occurred by putting the victim a victim.

2) The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 3,00,000) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

(c)

The above sentence of the court below on Defendant B by the prosecutor is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the crime of this case with respect to Defendant A’s wrongful assertion of sentencing is acknowledged that the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant’s unreasonable execution of business and by deceiving several victims of the long term of time by deceiving them, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak, that the amount of damage is a large amount, the victims’ damage has not been completely recovered, and that the Defendant has been punished several times for the same crime.

However, in full view of the fact that the defendant has committed a crime in the trial for the first time, and that the defendant has agreed with the victim R at the trial for the first time, and actually paid a considerable amount of money in the trial for the victim, and the victim T wanted to take the defendant's wife against the defendant in the trial for the first time, and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstance and motive leading to the crime in this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2017.06.16 2016노5387

-대구지방법원 2016.05.13 2016노914

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.07.21 2016노69

-광주지방법원 2016.01.20 2015노2735

-광주지방법원 2017.11.23 2017노3633