1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance added the same content as Paragraph (2) to the pertinent part; and (b) other than adding the judgment as set forth in Paragraph (3) above with respect to the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim added at the court of first instance, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thereby,

2. The parts to be stated additionally in the trial; and

(a) the fourth written judgment of the first instance court is followed by the following basic facts:

The paragraph shall be added and the “each entry in evidence B or B or B or 10” shall be added to the grounds for recognition of the second paragraph.

E. The result of the litigation in the related case 1) The co-defendants in the first instance trial and Walalalala Draft (hereinafter “Walalala Draft”)

(3) The Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant Deposit Insurance Corporation for the transfer of ownership in the name of the Daejeon Mutual Savings and Finance Company (Seoul District Court No. 26889, Jun. 30, 199; hereinafter “instant transfer of ownership”).

The reason was that the donation contract which was the cause for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer, seeking the implementation of the procedure for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer, has lost its validity due to the non-performance of conditions. The defendant filed a lawsuit, and the judgment was rendered by the plaintiff that "the defendant shall pay the plaintiff KRW 2.21 million to the plaintiff at the same time with the payment from the plaintiff, and the defendant Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation appealed with Busan High Court Decision 2002Na9264, but the above appellate court stated that "the plaintiff shall pay the defendant KRW 4.39 billion to the defendant, and the defendant shall pay the above amount to the plaintiff at the same time with the payment from the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "decision in lieu of the instant conciliation")."

(2) On the other hand, the defendant Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation has the Busan High Court as to the decision in lieu of the instant conciliation.