Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2015, from around 01:10 to 01:20 on the same day, the Defendant purchased a small-scale 1 disease in E convenience stores located in Sinpo-si where the victim C is working, and then drinking the small-scale 1 disease above the ice cream cooling house, and the victim “the victim shall not drink in the convenience store.” The Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by force by preventing the entry of the customers entering the convenience store by, for instance, “the customers who reported to the police flabbbb wres,” who were flacing the disturbance, such as “the flab flab wres, and reported to the police flab.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Not only has the record of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but also has re-offending during the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, which requires strict punishment. However, in light of the fact that the suspension of execution is used by the victim and the degree of power of this case, it seems somewhat harsh to invalidate the suspension of execution due to the instant case, a fine is selected and the amount of fine is determined as per the order.