logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.01.25 2017고단1636
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million at the Changwon District Court’s branch on November 9, 2015 to five times the same military force as well as a person who was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry.

[Criminal facts]

1. No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. shall engage in speculative acts as a business by using slot machines or speculative gaming machines, other than speculative business;

Nevertheless, the defendant from the end of July 2017 to the same year.

8. By the end of 14.14, the Defendant, in macro-si B, was engaged in speculative activities as a business by setting up one of the speculative electronic recreation game machine in which the rating classification by the Game Water Management Committee was refused, allowing many unspecified customers visiting the above party room to put in cash in the above game machine, and exchanging the score obtained through the game at KRW 10,000 per 50.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry shall engage in a business of exchanging or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water;

Nevertheless, at the above time and place, the Defendant set up a single game machine for the game of the game of the game of the same time, which was classified by the Committee for Water Management, and let many unspecified customers visiting the above game of the game of the same time input cash in the game of the above game of the same time, and exchanged the points obtained through the game of 500 won per 500 points.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in exchanging intangible results obtained through the use of game water as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (only when the classification of the rating of a game machine in writing is revoked) and investigation report (the report on the calculation of an additional collection charge);

1. Printeds of control site photographs, and copies of business registration certificates; and

arrow