logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.24 2019고단2939
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On March 14, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car at around 09:30, and proceeded along the four-lane road in front of the D company Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government branch office, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, along the direction of the Gan apartment shooting distance, in the direction of the Gan apartment shooting distance.

At the same time, the signal-based vehicles were stopped at the front door, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as emphasizing the front door, accelerating the speed of the vehicle, securing the safety distance, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got a F K7 vehicle driven by the victim E (the 58-year-old) who was in the air traffic at the front of the vehicle driven by the Defendant due to negligence, and got the rear panion of the F K7 vehicle driven by the Defendant as the front panion of the said K7 vehicle in front of the said vehicle. due to the shock, the said K7 vehicle was now pushed in the future, and was driven by the victim G (the 60-year-old) who was in front of the signal at the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc., in which approximately two weeks of medical treatment is required, and suffered injury on the victim G, such as light fat, tensions, and tensions that require three weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the victim’s laps to the extent that KRW 10,954,216 of repair cost, such as the exchange of pan-caters, etc., of the victim’s laps to the extent that 1,432,926 of repair cost, such as the exchange of laps, etc., of the victim’s laps, even if 1,432

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Medical Certificate (E, G), Statement of Automobile Inspection and Maintenance (F),

arrow