The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A. The appeal by Defendant C and the prosecutor are not guilty.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A did not acquire the industrial accident insurance money of the Victim Labor Welfare Service in collusion with the Defendants.

B. Defendant C1) In collusion with the Defendants, the Defendant did not have acquired the industrial accident insurance money of the Victim Labor Welfare Service in collusion.

2) The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and three years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

(c)

The Prosecutor (Defendant C)’s punishment by the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Determination as to Defendant A’s assertion 1) Summary of the facts charged against Defendant A is the head of the business headquarters of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) (hereinafter “K”), the representative director of K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”), and the Defendant, who belongs to the Jinizing Business, transported showers, etc. to the above truck at the request of the said company.

C around 03:20 on July 9, 2010, the Defendant was expected to have been hospitalized in a heavy state, such as snow peas, in need of about 14 weeks of treatment due to the accident that happens when the Defendant was unable to purchase industrial accident insurance at the port of loading and unloading of showers, and the Defendant was expected to have received approximately 14 weeks of treatment expenses, etc., and requested the above A and his family members to request industrial accident insurance management for the medical expenses, etc. from the above A and their family members, and requested the above K representative director, who is the cooperation company on the first day of August 2010, to change the industrial accident insurance management by phoneing the above K representative as if he was an employee belonging to the above K.

B Upon the request of the above C, at the office located in Guro-gu Seoul NO building 302, the defendant is working as the employee of K and prepares a false labor contract, disaster confirmation, medical care application, etc. as if the accident occurred during the loading and unloading work, and then on August 13, 2010, the above employment contract is made to the employee under the name of the branch office of the victim Labor Welfare Corporation.