The judgment below

July 6, 2005 and for the same year

7.8. We reverse the part concerning fraud.

The defendant is punished by a fine.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below and the evidence presented in the court below, the defendant did not have any injury to the extent of receiving hospitalized treatment as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and therefore, it can be acknowledged that the defendant deceivings the insurance company and defrauds the insurance proceeds as if he was hospitalized in the hospital by exaggeration of the degree of injury even though he operated the taxi

2. The facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows.

1) Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant, as a private taxi driver, was hospitalized on September 30, 2004 at Egymnasium located in Yangsan-si D, the Defendant gymnasium, and gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium from October 4, 2004 to November 24, 2004, gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium gymnasium g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g. g., g. g., g. g., g., g., g., g., g., g. g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g. g., g.