The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around February 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the Defendant on the part of the Defendant, on the ground that he did not set a cab on the part of the Defendant’s wife on the part of the Defendant, on the ground that he did not set a cab, while getting a cab driven by the Victim C (33 years of age) in front of the Government-si; (b) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, he was able to see that he did not set a cab on the part of the Defendant’s wife on the part of the Defendant, who was on board the cab, but was on the part of the Defendant.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim C expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on October 16, 2015 after the prosecution of this case, it can be recognized that the victim C expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant on October 16, 2015, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.