A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) “The Defendant has a customer who knows a taxi article” on the front 102-ro 7-gil, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-ro 102, the 112-ro 7-ro, the 7-ro 39-ro, the 202-ro, the 102-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201-ro, the 201

The expression "to die her," and was in the surroundings;

D, as a driver of the driver's seat next to the driver's seat of the knive patrol vehicle, the 406,756 won of the repair cost was damaged by the articles used by public offices to be used in order to be more than 406,756 won and the utility was impaired.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time, obstructed the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officials by putting the victim slope C from the driver’s seat into her hand, sup the chest on several occasions, threatening the chest, and threatening him to “I am fechere and die his family member,” and threatening him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of parts damaged by patrols;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The punishment of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is not sufficient if the defendant, for the reason of the sentencing, damages the police officer's acts obstructing the police officer's performance of official duties to the patrol car which is a public article

However, the extent of damage of the patrol car by the defendant is minor, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, the defendant seems to have committed any contingent act under the influence of alcohol, and the fact that the defendant is against his/her will be considered as favorable circumstances.

In addition, the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the defendant.