beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 16, 2007 to July 14, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was diagnosed of kidne tuberculosis in around 1966 and performed kidney kidneying surgery and breathing surgery, etc., and was living in the form of inserting the breathum in the body body while living in the form of inserting the breathum in the body part of the body body, and there were two weeks ago signs of pulmone disorder caused to the Defendant’s breathy in the body body (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). Since one week prior to the internal body, the breathy, the breathum in the body of the Defendant hospital was hospitalized after being discharged from the emergency department of the Defendant hospital on April 2, 2007.
(b) From April 2, 2007 to the same year;
(1) The deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on April 2, 2007 and was hospitalized as of April 2, 2007.
4. 12. Discharge on December, 199, the course of treatment for the above period is as shown in [Attachment 1].
(2) On April 12, 2007, when the Deceased discharged the Defendant Hospital on April 12, 2007, there was no pulmonal difficulty and breathesis, and there was a bruption of a new function and chroat, and there was no appeal against the unique symptoms other than the bruptic fluorum of both other parts.
(c) From May 16, 2007 to the same year;
5. During the period of medical examination and treatment between July 17, 2007 (1) the Deceased moved back to the outside of the Defendant Hospital on May 16, 2007. At the time, the Deceased did not seem to have any specially aggravated symptoms compared to the condition at the time of discharge prior to the discharge.
(2) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital intended to perform luminous therapy against the deceased in order to determine whether it is possible to implement luminous expansion, and bladical bladrology in order to determine whether there is any inconvenience, urine, and bladical bladrosis due to the attraction of the deceased’s bladrosis.
(3) After inserting a teratology through the deceased’s teratology, the Defendant Hospital’s medical team attempted to bathere and urine to examine bathere and urine conditions by inserting the teratology. During that process, the teratter inserted the teratium and suspended the injecting of the cathere through the teratium, and thereafter, the deceased’s.