logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.08.20 2015고단1066
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On August 23, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Daegu District Court on August 23, 201, and on April 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 7 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Office of the Daegu District Court on April 3, 201, and was punished for a drunk driving five times.

【Criminal Facts” around 03:15 on July 10, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.145%, driven a Cunstren vehicle at a 1km section of approximately 1km to the front of the GSS convenience store located in the Daegu Seo-gu 285 Daegu Bank Sungroporo, Daegu 285, without a driver’s license.

Accordingly, even though the Defendant violated the prohibition provisions on driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle without a driver's license in violation of the said provisions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstances of a drinking driver and notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to the same criminal records);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation was sentenced to a fine twice due to a drunk driving. In particular, after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a drunk driving on February 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for 4 months from this court by again driving under the influence of alcohol, and was sentenced to a fine by the appellate court, and was sentenced to a fine by the appellate court. In other words, even if he was sentenced to a fine by driving under the influence of alcohol on April 2014, the Defendant committed the instant crime, and thus, the Defendant was punished with severe punishment.

arrow