logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단3616
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized Nos. 1 to 3 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall provide game water different from the contents of a rating with a game product for the use thereof, and shall conduct money exchange for tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game product as a business.

피고인은 2018. 2. 20. 경부터 2018. 2. 28. 경까지 대전 동구 B 건물, 지하 1 층에 있는 피고인 운영의 ‘C 게임 랜드 ’에서, 게임 물관리 위원회로부터 등급 분류를 받은 내용과 다른 내용의 ‘ 띵 호와’ 게임 물 74대를 설치해 놓고 영업하면서 그곳을 방문한 불특정 다수의 손님들의 이용에 제공하고, 위 손님들이 위 게임 물을 이용하여 획득한 점수를 성명 불상의 환 전업자를 통해 환전하여 주었다.

As a result, the defendant provided game water that is different from the classified contents, and used it as a business to return tangible and intangible results acquired through it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant or D by the prosecution;

1. Protocols of seizure, evidence of seizure and list of seizure;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report;

1. Application of statutes on game explanation;

1. Article 45 subparagraph 4 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 (the point of providing other contents for the use of game products), Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 (the point of providing for the use of game products) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the choice of imprisonment with labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the confession of the defendant and the fact that the defendant is against the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, the game of this case is concealed even though it appears that there is another person who manages or actually operates the game of this case, and the crime is not good due to the narrowness of the methods and contents of the crime of this case.

arrow