logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.11.27 2012가단35158
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,823,858 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from October 25, 2009 to November 27, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Existence of liability for damages

A. On October 25, 2009, at around 14:50 on October 25, 2009, there was an accident that conflict with D Driving E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) operated by B (hereinafter “Defendant”) (hereinafter “Defendant”) in the direction of the inspection station in the direction of the inspection station, among the left-hands in the direction of the inspection station in the direction of the Gu. (2) The Defendant is the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, and the Plaintiff was on the back seat of the driver’s seat on the Plaintiff’s side while he was on board the back seat of the driver’s seat, and then, on the part of the instant accident, i.e., the bones that connects the bones and the bones of the bones and the bones of the lower bones.

Abandonment means the one close to the body center.

(A) The original body abandonment represents the central body and the human body.A brief statement would be close to the shoulder, which is not the elbow, among the bones of the arms.

It is the victim of injury, such as pulverization.

B. According to the facts seen earlier prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident, as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, since it is determined that the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the negligence of the Defendant’s driver’s breach of duty of care on

C. Restrictions 1 on liability for damages: (a) the following circumstances revealed by the evidence as seen earlier and the following are revealed; (b) the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle conflict with each other; (c) D, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle adjacent to the collision, reflects on the fact that the Plaintiff, who was on board the back of the driver’s seat, suffered from the light of the climatic and the climatic climatic climatic clif, which requires at least two weeks of treatment; and (d) the Plaintiff, who was on board the back of the driver’s seat, suffered from serious injury, such as the clifization of the clifed clifed clifed clif, which requires at least 1 weeks of treatment (i.e., the Plaintiff’s vehicle suffered damage to the front part of the engine room.

arrow