The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (ten months of imprisonment, four years of suspended sentence, four years of probation, and 80 hours of compliance driving) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, which reflects his mistake while driving the crime, that the defendant was not guilty, and that the defendant was found to have no criminal record, and that he did not cause any traffic accident, even though he was found to have committed the same crime, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of three million won on November 25, 2004, and a fine of two million won on November 17, 2008; the defendant was driven under the influence of 0.139% alcohol concentration while driving the crime, and was found to have been discovered to have been under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.139%, and continued to drive the crime without the alcohol.

In addition, in light of the fact that the nature of the crime was discovered in the course of the crackdown, and the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by taking into account all favorable circumstances for the Defendant, and there is no special change in the trial, and other various circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, the process and motive leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.