logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.12 2018나71885
대여금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

Reasons

The grounds for appeal concerning the plaintiff, the plaintiff and the defendant's main claim and counterclaim are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court including the witness K and C of this court, the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court on the main claim and counterclaim are justified.

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the parts used in the second half as follows: The reasons for the judgment of this court are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Accordingly, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part to be used in the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the plaintiff has the obligation to pay" to the same 6 lines from "the plaintiff has the obligation to pay" to the same 6 lines.

As of March 9, 201, 201, 35,000 won out of loans of 40,000,000 won and loans of 55,00,000,000 won with interest-free interest-free interest-based loans of 35,00,000 won as of May 31, 201. After March 9, 2011, the Plaintiff additionally lent KRW 24,80,000 as interest-free interest to the Defendant. Meanwhile, the Defendant paid KRW 63,346,000 among the principal and interest of each of the above loans to the Plaintiff from March 9, 201 to January 2, 2014, the Defendant did not have any obligation to pay the Plaintiff the principal and interest-free interest-based loans of KRW 41,45,00,00,000 including loan loans of KRW 50,000,000,00,000.

arrow