The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won in penalty) is too unhued and unfair.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant inflicted injury upon the victim G, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment; (b) the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s performance of official duties by police officers who intend to arrest the Defendant as an offender; and (c) damaged patrol vehicles; (d) the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months on October 30, 2014; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime on perjury on November 7, 2014 after the judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2014; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of probation; (d) the Defendant did not have the record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (e) the Defendant supported the two children of the same kind of crime after divorce; and (e) the Defendant supported the her age, sex, environment, motive, circumstance, etc. of the instant crime; and (e) the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to have been too unfair, taking account of the following circumstances:

Therefore, the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing is without merit.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit.