1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) around September 2003, 200: (b) around August 2006, 2006: (c) around October 2008, the Plaintiff saw two different children; (d) but (e) around October 2008, did not report marriage.

However, C was in an internal relationship with the Defendant, which led to the de facto marital relationship between the Plaintiff and C, which led to the failure at the end of June 2012.

Since the defendant knew that C was in a de facto marital relationship with the plaintiff, thereby causing the failure of the plaintiff's marital life, the defendant is liable to pay consolation money to the plaintiff.

2. Each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4 (including a provisional number) is not sufficient to recognize that Eul conspired with the plaintiff while knowing that it was a de facto marital relationship with the plaintiff, which led to the failure of a de facto marital relationship with the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion based on this premise is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.