Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2013, around the 19:10th floor entrance of the C Hospital located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan, on the ground that the Defendant did not properly perform medical treatment in another hospital emergency room, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol on the ground that the victim E (the age of 41) belonging to the D Zone D District of the Busan Northern Police Station, sent out after receiving 112 a notification of penalty as a drinking disturbance; (b) upon issuing a notification of penalty payment, the Defendant issued a notification of penalty payment; (c) immediately teared the notification of penalty payment; (d) cut the victim’s sexual organ by hand; (d) the victim’s shouldered the victim’s shoulder with his left hand; (e) interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the crime prevention and maintenance of order of the victim; and (e) caused the victim’s left hand without knowing the number of days of medical treatment at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E police statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Code of the corresponding Article of the Criminal Code against the crime (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment as a crime of serious injury);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the fact that he/she has been sentenced to a fine as well as a penalty, has reached the case again, is

On the other hand, it is more favorable for the defendant to make a confession of the crime of this case and to refrain from committing such a crime again while his depth is divided, and the defendant is regarded as a person who can sufficiently reflect his act and seems to be faithful to his business.

Considering the above unfavorable circumstances, various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the age, occupation, and background leading to the crime of this case, shall be considered.