logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.06.24 2020고단1
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and one year of suspended execution for the crime of bodily injury in the Gwangju District Court's net support on October 10, 2019, and the judgment was finalized on October 18, 2019.

1. On July 15:30, 2019, the Defendant, on the ground that the Victim B (the 17-year-old age) was not making his examination, committed assault, such as: (a) making the Victim B with the sperm entering the area of the Defendant, such as the bend of, and walking up, the 8-time suckbucks, the victim’s sprinks, the victim’s sprinks, the victim’s sprinks, the victim’s sprinks, the victim’s sprinks, and the victim’s sprinks on about nine occasions by drinking.

2. Around 18:00 on August 22, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim by hand on the ground that the victim was not taking his/her own examination gate, on the ground that the victim was not taking his/her own examination gate, walking the victim’s bucks, walking the victim’s knekbbbbbs, keling the victim with kne, and kneing the victim’s kne, and keling the part of the victim’s knebbs by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B and C;

1. Reports on internal investigation, photographs of parts damaged by violence, and photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. and the application of one copy of the judgment and one copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are disadvantageous to the fact that a student in a high school with the reason of sentencing is not good enough to commit a crime, and that the student did not receive a written appearance from the victim.

However, it is necessary to consider equality with the case of concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act between the crime of bodily injury and the crime of bodily injury for which judgment of first head has become final and conclusive in the judgment of this case.

arrow