All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on Defendant A’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant A guilty of the facts charged in this case (excluding the acquittal portion) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

2. On the grounds of its reasoning, the lower court acquitted Defendants on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act due to the acquisition of 48 means of access listed in the attached list of crimes against Defendants among the instant facts charged, and the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act due to the acquisition of the means of access listed in the attached list of crimes against Defendants A, and not guilty.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.