logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.01.12 2019가단266668
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant E and F Co., Ltd. are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff A for 54,224,893 won, Plaintiff B for 49,246,866 won, and Plaintiff C for 18.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant E or F

(a) an indication of the reasons for the claim as shown in the Attachment to the indication of the claim (other than the part on the defendant D); (b) a judgment deemed to be a confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Claim against Defendant D

A. Defendant D, the gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion, in collusion with E, G, H, I, J, etc., will pay high profit in a short period by iceing investment in virtual currency.

The plaintiffs deceiving the plaintiffs.

Defendant D received a total of KRW 202,965,185, as shown in the attached Table 1 investment details from Plaintiff A, and acquired the said money by fraud, and returned only KRW 148,740,292,292, and thereby inflicted damages on KRW 54,224,893, as shown in the attached Table 2 investment details. ② The Defendant was liable to compensate each of the above Plaintiffs for damages, as the Plaintiff received a total of KRW 400,265,30, as shown in the attached Table 2 investment details from Plaintiff B, and acquired the said money by fraud, and returned only KRW 351,018,434, and returned only KRW 351,246,866, as in the attached Table 3 investment details. ③ The Defendant was obligated to compensate for damages.

B. (1) In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties on the determination of the amount of fraud against the plaintiffs by the defendant D (A) and the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 8, 9 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 6, and Eul evidence Nos. 7, Defendant D will be able to make profits by means of virtual currency investment, etc., even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal of the investment, in collusion with the accomplices, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal of the investment.

The fact that the defendant was found guilty of the crime of deceiving the victims by deceit (the Incheon District Court Decision 2019 Gohap 602, 2020, 627, 2020, and 26 August 26, 2020) and the part concerning the criminal facts of the above criminal judgment, in collusion with E and H, shall be the agency of AO insurance from April 19, 2017 to February 18, 2018.

arrow