logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.05 2019고합181
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was the operator of the e-mail event company around October 19, 2018, the Defendant, as the operator of the e-mail event company, has overall control over the operation of lighting and sound equipment of the school festivals at the fifth floor of the Cmiddle School in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu. The Defendant is the victim D (a name, leisure, 14 years old).

At around 12:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) completed a dance performance; (b) reported the victim’s completion of the performance of the dance; and (c) stated that the victim shacked the victim, and then the knicked the victim about about 30 seconds, and stated that the knicked the knick, the knicked, the knicked, the knicked, and the knicked, the kn

At around 12:29 on the same day, the Defendant continued to sit in the victim's side, with the hands of the victim, and with the right hand of the victim following the victim, the victim's lux and tur with the right hand. At around 12:32, the lux and mar of the victim were rhumd with the victim's lux and mar.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by force against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

2. In a judgment, the burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to cause a judge to feel true that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt against the defendant even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(2) In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed as proved without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant committed an indecent act as stated in the facts charged.

The defendant is consistently in the course of investigation to this court.

arrow