logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원논산지원 2015.11.05 2015가단2044
면책확인
Text

1. The payment order issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on September 14, 201 by the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court of the Republic of Korea.

Reasons

1. On September 14, 201, the Daejeon District Court Branch of the District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court issued a payment order against the Plaintiff on September 14, 201, and then, on December 26, 2012, the Defendant received a seizure and collection order (the Daejeon District Court Branch Branch of the Daejeon District Court Branch of the 2012TTT 20153) as to each of the deposit claims against the Plaintiff’s National Bank, the New Bank, and the Bank of Korea as the executive title of the said payment order.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed an application for bankruptcy and discharge with the Daejeon District Court on December 10, 2009, and was declared bankrupt or bankrupt on November 22, 2010 (2009Hadan5470), and the decision of discharge became final and conclusive on March 11, 2013 (209do5472) around that time. The creditor’s “C” described in the No. 11 of the creditors’ list in the instant case is merely a simple clerical error in the Defendant’s name, and the Defendant was guaranteed procedural rights as a creditor in the instant case.

Therefore, the compulsory execution based on the above payment order should be dismissed, as the military court of the 201j419 court that granted the plaintiff's major support to the defendant by the above exemption decision was exempted from the obligation based on the payment order.

2. Judgment based on the recommendation of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow