logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2018.01.11 2017고단182
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On March 3, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's interest support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2016.

[2] The Defendants and the Defendant conspired to acquire the nominal money of the loan by deceiving the financial institutions by selling apartment units and creating the right to collateral security upon the purchase of apartment units against the financial institutions.

“D” means to allow a loan.

In the role of recruiting Defendants, Defendant B took part in the crime of Defendant A, accompanied by the borrower’s father, and exchanged with D, etc., Defendant A took part in the loan process; Defendant A took part in the act of deceiving a person in charge of Saemaul credit cooperative as if he was an apartment purchaser; H, I, and J notified Defendants of the method of deceiving the person in charge of Saemaul credit cooperative in the loan process by introducing the Defendants in sequence from “D” and then prepared the loan-related documents; G finally transfers the loan to G account; and F takes part in the role of ordering G to withdraw the above payment; and E takes part in the direction and management of the above crime.

According to the above conspiracy, around May 19, 201, the Defendants received from the head office of the Saemaul Treasury, H, I, and J, the agreement for the sale of K apartment in the name of Gangwon-do, as Defendant A, who entered into a contract with K apartment 102 Dong 404 in the name of Gangwon-do, and received false education as Defendant A was an employee in charge of lending the above light light, as Defendant A was the actual seller of the above apartment.

Then, the Defendants entered the above safe loan counseling co-ordin with J, and the above safe loan staff member was able to reach as if the Defendant A actually sold the apartment house, and the sales contract prepared as above is false.

arrow