logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.04.23 2016두41903
유선사업면허신청에 따른 민원서류반려통지처분취소
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court determined that the instant disposition that rejected the Plaintiff’s application for a license for the excursion ship business was lawful, on the grounds that there was no evidence to support that the title trust agreement was made between I fishing village fraternity and the Plaintiff, L, Defendant Intervenor E, and F regarding the permission for the implementation of a park project, and that the Plaintiff did not have the right

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is justifiable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the confirmation of parties to the contract,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party, including the part arising from the participation in the appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow